Which of the following actions, without the copyright holder's consent, abides by federal fair use guidelines?

Duplicating a speech from a political campaign to teach a lesson on persuasion aligns with federal fair use guidelines because it falls under the educational use category, which is one of the key factors considered in fair use determinations. Educational purposes often allow for the incorporation of copyrighted materials, particularly when the material is used for critique, commentary, or instructional purposes.

Fair use allows educators to use portions of copyrighted materials to facilitate learning and promote understanding, especially in a classroom setting. In this case, using a political speech can spur discussions about rhetoric and persuasion techniques, enhancing the instructional experience without circumventing the rights of the copyright holder as long as the use is limited and serves an educational objective.

The other actions are less clear under fair use. Duplicating a book chapter for a discussion might exceed the boundaries of what is permissible, as it could be seen more as a redistribution of copyrighted material rather than a transformative educational use. Reposting a copyrighted article on social media without permission typically does not qualify as fair use, especially if it's intended for public display and might lack commentary or critique. Similarly, using a famous painting in a public presentation could infringe on the copyright holder's rights, depending on how it is used and the context in which it is presented.